There are no sheep on our farms
A rather respected name in the NZ music industry said to me, in the middle of a conversation the other day, about the commercial potential of a record, that sales of NZ music are in, and I quote, “complete freefall” and unlikely to improve in the near future. That, coupled with other informed comments on National Radio recently mentioning drops of some twenty percent or so this year, raises one big question. At least from where I’m sitting, several thousand miles from the action.
Namely, what in gods name happened?
Of course I’m absolutely aware of the on-going global downturn in sales of compact discs and the inevitable flattening out of digital sales.
Especially from acts represented by the major industry organisations such as the RIAA, or their equivalents.
But the percentage drop in sales, from labels represented by RIANZ (and that is a major qualifier) of NZ music, far exceeds the global trend and the word why flashes in neon rather brutally.
Two years ago the country was feting the rise of
Having been away from NZ more or less for 18 months, I have an odd, skewered, almost half baked perception of what is happening there I guess. You get little news of the gilded isles outside the country itself unless you actively search. I’m only vaguely aware of what is happening politically and socially, even with the casual, but now irregular, look at the Herald. It used to be my browser’s homepage but has since been replaced by a personalised Google news page, which is both handier and more relevant to where I am now. Much of what I do get comes from the odd look at Public Address and the stream of valuable emails I still get from the nest.
But, having been intimately involved with New Zealand indigenous music (and I mean the stuff made by or in NZ, not music of the Tangata Whenua) for close to thirty years I’m still keenly wanting to know what is or is not happening in an industry that I know, and I suppose, love, so well. It’s in my blood. Most of my information, as detailed above, comes from arch cynics, both inside and on the side lines of the industry. All of them have been or are players in recording the stuff that we like to puff our chests out about and say “this is ours!”
And so to them too, I genuinely ask, what happened. True, this week sees twelve NZ albums in the Top 40, many admittedly in the lower regions where retail bias and negligible real sales are the rule rather than the exception. But that said, they still exist in, what, until a decade ago, was a very rare place to find any NZ albums, especially independent releases.
But you look closer and note that The Black Seeds, who’ve been at number one for two weeks, is still not certified gold, and that Bic Runga’s rather highly regarded current album is only, after all this time, triple platinum whereas its predecessors had sold, at a similar distance from their release dates, three times that figure. That coupled with the relative failure (dare I say flop) of more than a few albums by hitherto major selling artists or acts with huge expectations placed on them in the past year or two, bodes ill for an industry that sits on knife thin margins for their local music in a tiny, tiny market. A market where major record companies only release local music because of a personal passion one or two people at the top of a company may hold. I hate to think how much Universal have put into their local repertoire in recent years, often with mixed results, but that they continue to do so says more I imagine about the absolute and laudable belief and vision of the MD, which goes far beyond the relentless bean counting so often required of the big four in their drive to survive, than commercial realities. Then again, having signed the only two real domestically signed international success stories of the past two decades, I guess the potential returns are more evident at that company than elsewhere.
So, to the current scenario, I’m really not putting forward answers, although I have my theories, most of which I’ve gone into before here and elsewhere. One factor though is evident. Sadly
But not in
The rise of such a culture in the NZ mainstream has been, and is, stifled by the lack of access to online services; the non penetration of wireless hotspots which are a lifestyle necessity to so many; and a host of other factors. But pass NZ by, it most clearly has despite the best efforts of the likes of the wonderful Amplifier, which still remains the only real option in-country to access digital indigenous music.
There are other things I could easily mention, such as they damage the drive to fulfil radio quotas at the expense of the artist and an indigenous identity, the time wasted trying to blame blank CDs and ruminating about format shifting, and such like but I’ve been there before and see no need to repeat what I see as obvious.
I don’t for a moment think all is doom and gloom. Look at the IMNZ newsletter or the chart percentages I mentioned earlier and tell me that there is not momentum. It’s just that right now the momentum seems to have a reached a crucial place where what it is, how it is defined, and who by is being decided. And there is a thought that the place the industry was in two years ago was perhaps somewhat unrealistic and this may just be, in the scheme of things, a natural correction process.
I guess this post really was more of a question to myself, rather than a desire to look at try and analyse too much, especially as I am doing it from afar, as more of an interested observer than a day to day participant now. The next twelve months will be interesting.
6 comments:
I'm optimistic. NZ content on radio is down to 17% - the lowest it's been in quite some time - and yet compare the situation to 8 years ago rather than 2.
NZ does need to embrace the digital download era more fully - and only widespread rollout of sensible broadband will cause that to happen. And I'm sorry, 256kbps is not broadband.
Unbundling's a good start - but now the competition needs to heat up in that area. And I think it's pretty well inevitable that it will. So - give it another 18 months, and I think you'll see an improvement.
Digirama.co.nz could have been good news, but probably isn't.
from my couch it seems we're spoilt locally (music wise) too much so.
Far too many releases for a static to declining number of purchasers means more releases fail than do well (breakeven should not be a good result) - especially at the less commercial end of the spectrum
Our habits are changing also, gigs sellout regularly now for example, whereas once that concept was simply fantasy.. we will invest in experiences not products
simply put, we need more people for all of our talent to be able to enjoy a viable and profitable local market and the choices that population brings
on the bright side, my god there really is something for everyone now musically, tis a wonderful thing - even if too easy to miss/overlook
I know this is a little beside the point, but I wouldn't call labels represented by RIANZ 'a major qualifier', looking at the members list on the RIANZ website. I would be hard pressed to think of a NZ label that isn't represented.
Jessie, Mai and Stinky Jim's labels for a start..that took me about 3 seconds. There are plently of indies not covered by RIANZ
Fair enough.. that's a start.
"embrace the digital download era more fully"
sounds good but what does that mean ???
Does it mean stop playing double standard hypocrisy and start p2p file sharing kiwi stuff and not just foreign stuff ???
I don't think those fools at the music industry commission have any idea what it means cos they're too busy going to music festivals and conferences and funding stupid workshops on how to access funding as if that'll make a difference ...
...those clowns at apra and rianz might know what it means but are too shit scared of embracing anything that'll make them redundant so are looking to keep their heads wound in and take their cues from overseas
and the idiots at NZ on air still wouldn't know art from crap or what to embrace when it comes to pop even if someone glued headphones to their ears and forcefed it to them cos they're too busy funding one hit fly buy night wonders for the radio that sound like cheap imitations of nasty foreign muck...
FUCK RADIO all they want is bland filler between the ads anyway !!!
...as for the 'majors' I'd like to know why they're still accessing NZ on air funding instead of investing in and developing local talent solely from their own coffers
oh yeah, that's right they do it cos they can...
I wonder what would happen if we cut off funding to any label with a major distributor and the majors themselves ???
...and made the music commission jobs performance based depending on sales of groups they take under their wing. You know, give em all 5 bands each, a budget and say pimp this shit like your job depended on it cos it would
Use regional reps from NZ on Air to act as A&R to find these 5 bands each. That would actually mean they'd have to get off their arses and go spot some talent and show some commitment to fully fund artists instead of every few months artists going piecemeal cap in hand armed with a bit of paper and a cd to Welli via snail mail
Then get rid of that know nothing smyth prick at NZ on air and get a bit of fresh Air on NZ...
Why ??? cos he's so analogue his foo foo valve needs replacing with a transistor and he doesn't even know it...
...or how about uploading songs direct to an NZ on air server and people voting for the artists to get funding with radio programmers paying an advance on tunes outright from said server instead of funding this embarrassing idol thing ???
The thing is I can digitally pimp shit as good as anyone but what's the point if there's no money in it ???
SHOW ME THE MONEY !!!
*enter maniacal laugh here*
BTW did I miss anyone with them potshots ???
Post a Comment